Search the world with 36 nations plus UN plus IMF agreeing with china that coastal ports and railRoads link over 90% of world trade $BR0 china
#BR12 UN IMF #BR1 japan far east isles asean10 Malaysia #BR2 Bangladesh india Pakistan #BR3 Russia #BR4 central euro/asia #Br5 west euro Italy Switzerland #BR6 n america #BR7 UAE mideast #BR8 med sea nations #BR9 africa - egypt rwanda #BR10 Latin AM #BR11 Arctic/polar

top Belt Road Maps of 2018 s Entrepreneurial networks best cases in China & Bangla:
BillionGirlsBoys ask: can every banker/educator see their trust in Belt Road's top 100 stories.. Is Trump King Canute? Valueless is The economist whose world trade maps fail poorest billion youth's livelihoods in our children's worldwide

(BRI) Belt Road Imagineering is now trusted by 70 national leaders as empowering the sustainbility generation- which of these 100 stories can help bankers or educators near you join in to this system for mapping win-win trades aligned to the sustainability goals generation? portal 1

catalogue world record jobs creators by 13 BRI maps- tour BR clubs- EWTP celebrate first people freed by e-commerce and jack ma map top 13 sdg world trade routes 0 inside china, 1 East-Belt,
2 South-Belt; 3NorthBelt
4 centre eurasia &E.Euro; 5WEuro 6 N.Am; 7 MidEast8MedSea 9Africa 10LatinAm11 Arctic Circle 12UN-urgent....
BELT Road quiz

Belt quiz is about earth's seas and coastal belt - which coastal belt is your country most dependent on, does if have a superport connecting maps of world favorite superports, do your peoples have access to this superport (nb we recommend analysing countries imprt and exports by 1 energy, 2 all other goods
Road quiz : what are your continents longest roads (designed as including all of railroad or car-road, pipes for energy, water, sanitaion; tech cables)- do your peoples have access to the great roads

technology now permis us to play game: which peoples have been most deprived by accidents of history to basic belt road freedoms- among 10 most populated nations no people have been less included than those in bangladesh- tell us where else you map.....................
today offers the livelihood learning network poorest billion communities need most - 40 years ago
online library of norman macrae--.........................Entrepreneurial Revolution - curriculum: how to value small enterprise and sustainability exponentials of net generation - by alumni of Norman Macrae The Economist 1968. By 1976, Norman best news ever: the fifth of the world (whose brand reality is) Chinese can be valued by netgen as critical friends to uniting sustainability race for planet and humanity
eg EWTP : 21st C version of Silk Road of celebrated by Marco Polo and Hangzhou goal 14 oceansAIIB 1 ted hosts -- 2017 year of mapping sustainability banking -china to commercialize 5g by 2020 -valuing culture -jack ma 1 2e3 maps 1) countries joining Chinese inspired sustainability open systems solutions as well as 2) which global youth professions (eg coding) are mapping value sustaining trades with china

Tuesday, December 31, 2030 co-author 1884's 2025 report  writes- can we the people escape the big brother end game caused by politicians egos taking over from what we the peoples- our children as first sdg generation could do with trillion times more comp and connec than needed to code the moon race- timeline 1 90% of humans will need to know by start of 21st c that man's greatest risk is dscrepancy in incomes and expectations between rich and poor nations

flask back :43 year ago to the most exciting human development journey on the planet starts with a fifth of the world's people in 1977 -ready to come out of poverty on mainland china - trapped for over 120 years by britain's assertion that either the chinese accept opium as a trading currency or the counttry be disconnected form world trade -and all because the britis ruling classes loved cups of tea

dad norman macrae reports from china in the economist 1977 - 


cut to summer 2017 -what will happen next

Joint Press Release of the Fourth “1+6” Roundtable November 21st, 2019 Beijing China Premier Li Keqiang of the State Council of China, together with World Bank Group (WBG) President David Malpass, International Monetary Fund (IMF) Managing Director Kristalina Georgieva, World Trade Organization (WTO) Deputy DirectorGeneral Alan Wolff, International Labor Organization (ILO) Director-General Guy Ryder, Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) SecretaryGeneral Angel Gurría, Financial Stability Board (FSB) Chair Randal K. Quarles, held the“1+6” Roundtable (hereafter referred to as “the Roundtable” )in Beijing on November 21st , 2019. Themed around “Promoting Openness, Stability and High Quality Development of the World Economy”, the participants had candid exchange of views on the world economy and the Chinese economy, and global economic governance. All parties stressed the need to pursue appropriate fiscal, monetary and financial policies, continue to advance structural reform, shore up financial resilience, maintain and strengthen the rules-based multilateral trading system, support appropriate participation of countries in global value chains, advance international cooperation, strengthen the facilitation of global public goods, strengthen development cooperation around sustainable development, promote quality job creation and support a humancentered approach to improve labor markets; support China's high quality development through reforms and opening-up; and jointly work towards strong, sustainable, balanced and inclusive growth of the global economy.

Remarks by Angel Gurría

OECD Secretary-General

21 November 2019 - Beijing, People's Republic of China

(As prepared for delivery)




Dear Premier Li:

Thank you for your invitation to the fourth 1 + 6 Roundtable Meeting. Next year marks the 25th anniversary of OECD-China co-operation, and five years since your historic visit to our Headquarters in Paris, where we signed our first Joint Work Programme (JWP).  We look forward to finalising our next JWP, which will bring China closer to our best practice international standards. This will be good for China, and good for the world!

The global economy remains lacklustre, with many problems and pressures building up.

The OECD’s November Economic Outlook – which we released today – projects growth to ease to 2.9% in 2019 and barely reach 3% in 2020. This is a steep downgrade from what we expected just six months ago in advanced and emerging economies. They are also the weakest annual growth rates since the global financial crisis in 2008. As we’ve heard from others around the table, trade policy tensions are the main force dragging down the global economy. The accumulation of risks in the financial system – high debts and deteriorating debt quality in particular – is also troublesome.

Governments must coordinate and take action to steer their economies towards stronger, more inclusive and sustainable growth. In advanced economies, this requires a stronger use of fiscal policy, geared towards public investments to seize the opportunities of digitalisation and accelerate the energy transition. Fiscal action should be accompanied by a renewed commitment to structural reform. The OECD’s report, Progress on Structural Reform Under the G20 Enhanced Structural Reform Agenda (ESRA) – which we are releasing today – finds that G20 economies have made insufficient progress in advancing the structural reform agenda endorsed at the G20 Leaders’ Summit in Hangzhou, and must go further.


Let me share three global priorities on trade, markets, and tax to support today’s discussions.

First, halting the build-up of new trade restrictions and restoring predictability for people and businesses.

While tariffs are a big part of the story, trade facilitation also matters. Domestic regulations affecting both goods and services matter even more. For trade to flow freely, regulations must be transparent, non-discriminatory, and proportionate to the objective being pursued. We must address these concerns together, while also tackling new challenges, such as trade in the digital era and the dangerous impacts of trade on the environment. Reducing trade policy uncertainty will facilitate private investment and help revitalise growth prospects, particularly if agreed at the multilateral level.


Second, supporting fair, efficient, and well-governed markets.

The OECD’s international standards – reinforced by our Business for Inclusive Growth Initiative, which I launched with President Macron on the eve of the G7 Biarritz Summit last August – are key to levelling the global playing field.

We are continuing our dialogue with China on combatting bribery and corruption, strengthening corporate governance practices through China’s endorsement of the G20/OECD Principles of Corporate Governance, and elevating responsible business conduct practices.

Moving closer to OECD standards benefits the global economy while also helping China to diffuse tensions, ensure the best practice design of Belt and Road projects, and accelerate the progress of domestic reforms. For example, our recently revised Code of Liberalisation of Capital Movements can support China’s efforts to liberalise its capital flows. We look forward to working with China towards adherence to the revised Codes and our Anti-Bribery Convention, in line with the G20’s call for all Members to endorse these instruments.


Third, delivering a consensus-based global solution to the tax challenges arising from the digitalisation of the economy.

The G20 has mandated the OECD, working through the Inclusive Framework on BEPS, to deliver this solution by the end of 2020. Over 130 countries are working together on an equal footing to reconcile different perspectives, priorities and ideas into a common way forward. Our work on this issue represents multilateralism at its best; it shows what is possible when all countries embrace a spirit of co-operation. We aim to have an agreement on the core structure of the global solution by January, and a final agreement for political endorsement by June 2020. China’s leadership and support for this work is commendable and must continue.


China’s economic outlook.

Turning to China’s economic outlook, GDP growth will moderate to around 5.5 per cent in 2021, as the economy continues rebalancing from investment to consumption-led growth, and trade tensions remain high.

Against the backdrop of slowing investment, our forthcoming 2020 Economic Outlook for Southeast AsiaChina and India recommends that China place greater emphasis on the efficiency of investment projects, and let the market play a greater role in allocating resources and pricing of the factors of production. This recommendation is consistent with calls made by the Third Plenum of the 18th Central Committee in 2013.
Tackling current headwinds requires structural reforms that will support growth. For example, import tariff cuts over the past year have lifted per capita GDP growth by 2.5 percentage points over the long-run. An even greater impact is expected from reducing barriers to foreign direct investment: if China reduced FDI restrictiveness to the OECD average level, GDP growth would be boosted by over 10 percentage points in the long run!

As noted in our 2019 Economic Survey of China, efforts to support competitive neutrality should also continue.

Ladies and Gentlemen:

The OECD is proud to partner with China as it seeks to integrate further into the global economy and become a key pillar of the multilateral system. Multilateralism is the only way forward if we want to address the many problems we face, including the climate emergency. It brings all parties to the negotiating table, enhances mutual understanding and supports the development of best practices and international standards that address common global challenges.

The OECD looks forward to keep working with and for China to design, develop and deliver better policies for better lives. Thank you.

bye bye 2010s from starting 2020
during 2010s we experimented with 13 #br tags - whether you =use belt road or other glossary - 90% of we the peoples depend life critically on borderless world processes - remember tsunami 2004 that rolled on for 6 hours devastating coasts with no mobile phone warning peoples across borders - now we find we are no better protected against virus

have a look at some tours we are developing with googles relatively new tool join alumni of money marketers who loved to see societies thrive round planet earth
Economist's norman macrae foundation

map world in which english teaches greatest risk to species isgaps between rich & poor nations
Economist's norman macrae foundation

microcollege hub gravitating soros first 20 partners OSUNiversity what if man-machine sustainability= loving each others nations children

in 2020s we need more detailed mapping
coastal belts are vital as 90% of world trade of goods is shipped
however natures voices have been reported by eg atenborough-
7 worlds one planet reports from 7 contuntal lands
it foollow on blue oceans series that repored from ocean view
as un reminds u quarter of all nations are sids- small island developing states
-they have huge ocean fronts if little lan resources
thir ciral gets devasstated by ocean warming
their fish get suffcated by platic
their natural defence agaibst tsunmi gets destroyed by tourism developments
now their torist undustry may be devastated by virus travel restrictions
they are often in huurican pathways
many have since subprime been penalised - a few islands thatmoney lunder cause all islands to be punished by some of the digital world standard makers
-a reminder of how we humans have no futureif we cant map deepest local diversitie- much smarer education is needed gennmically if the younger half of the world are to be the sd generation

fortuately someone like jack ma is a universal local hero- helping unctad choose 100 youth from each developing nation - how can tech big data apps remap the borderless world weneed to share life critical last mile service designs around
1/4 oil exports russian friends, 1/4 saudi arabia f, nearly 1/4 North Am, rest in places big 3 made conflict zones- how's youth to win both peace with oil & beyond peak oil- sack all in congress & EU &HP unable to true media this,end $ as global money...
sometimes , especially as winter wonderland approaches, you have to wonder does us congress try to stop true media debates of human needs across east west maps because since jf kennedy assasination the ability of congress to map north south trade equitably has been more scary than the abomibale snowman

Wednesday, December 25, 2030

UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres spoke highly of the Belt and Road Initiative, saying
05:11, 28-Apr-2019

Antonio Guterres who is attending the second Belt and Road Forum for International Cooperation in Beijing.
11:16, 26-Apr-2019

Stressing that the UN is an important partner in co-building the Belt and Road, Chinese President Xi Jinping said China stands ready to work with the UN to comprehensively promote the building of the Belt and Road under the principle of achieving shared growth through discussion and collaboration.
09:10, 26-Apr-2019

Chinese President Xi Jinping highlighted innovation, green investment and the need for transparency in Belt and Road projects, as he slammed protectionism and called for more free trade at the opening of the Second Belt and Road Forum for International Cooperation in Beijing on Friday.
02:21, 26-Apr-2019

UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres has spoken exclusively to Chinese media in a joint interview
11:00, 24-Apr-2019

The BRI Forum is resetting perceptions where there might be problems to that end (debt, transparency), as well as create new platforms for future connectivity projects.
03:12, 24-Apr-2019

Development Goals and building a safer, more just world for future generations, UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres said on Tuesday.
22:43, 23-Apr-2019

UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres said Tuesday that the Belt and Road Initiative is a very important opportunity to the world.
22:00, 23-Apr-2019

Tuesday, December 24, 2030

Malaysian trade minister Darell Leiking said China and the US, “whether they like it or not, will impact everyone in the global value chain and supply chain”. Photo: AFP
malaYSIA first to found digital world's free trade area foR SMALL ENTERPRISES
Malaysian minister says China, US have ‘global responsibility’ on trade
27 Apr, 2019 - 04:18 pm
Darell Leiking says uncertainty created by conflict has caused shift in region’s supply chain that ‘has already impacted the world for five to 10 years’.

Tuesday, January 1, 2030

wow sustainability goals took lot of work- special thanks to youth of china and golden era of sino-english language relationships-

Jan 2018 to celebrate the golden era of sino-english learning economies proposed by China and Britains Prime Minister help world record jobs creators launch = curriculum of Belt Road Initiatives shared by 100 nations 5th grade teachers - valuing goodwill partnerships needed to end poverty by 2020 and be benchmark for ecological civilsation by 2050 -mapping youth frindship networks : china to and from the workld's coastlines and overland (engineering 21st C rails, pipes of green energy, water telcom)

Sunday, January 16, 2022

 Chinese Capitalism will be 50 years old in 2025 : in the sense that non-state companies did not exist before 1976

It is important to learn from the grartest human development miracle (one fifth of the world's people) independently from the politics of nations

China started with a triad - vilage enterpises , supercity enterprsies (ie disapora chinese were invited to inward invest billions at a time primarisly mirroring infrastructure that had risen since 1960 out of singapore, hong kong taiwan in continuing the sueprcityy trend started by  japan's tokyo and korea's seoul 

Every decade its important to ask what happened next to vilage suistainability as well as what happened to the huge growth possibilities iof tegh world's most valuable coastal belt from tokyo to singapore (note multiple interdependecies - chiense coast and coastline south of china to singapore; the main diaspora investiors from taiwan hk singapore; from the point of view of the united states of asia-

you have these north and south coastlibes; then you have to singaopore's east and north asean ; then potentially the cttp- ie every place that depends on pacific trades; and of course you have questions about what hapens to south asia's coastline west of singpare; or thr frozne north asia/arctic belt (the complexity of russia nortyh korea interacting with other energy defining districts of the arctic circel)

from the devleopment viewpoit of a fifth of teh world's people - it was logical to map leagues of cities

the simplest coatal map begins by assuming beijining shaghai taiwan hong kong value each others connections; and all the other major port cities in china's continent design their infrastructure both to match ersponsibilities to vilage china and as win-wins across different industries and natural resourecs; for sure there is confkict here but as fara as capitalism goes the diaspora money investmed in the mainland; the one china policy was driven by extreme capitalism logics

if you care about devleopment of families, communities all across the map of china and its connections with the rest of teh world; it is worth understanding the infrastructure logics of the future of the chiense people (and then asking so whare do national identities fit in)

in other bwords 

you had the 4 original investing city capitals (beijing shanghai taiwan hong kong)

you have other major coastal cities

you have realtionships to non coastal cities including inland belt roads primarily shaped by the realtionships o9f trains and shipping locations

you have integration of rural (food , energyu resources with cities)

and you have the compolexity of about 20 neighbors or near neighbors

sustainability of the asian two thirds of humans comes from mapping these logics at a meta national and deep rural level not just the poilitics between 200 nations the way that eg usa and euroepan union the white empires main startegic planners see future of life

Friday, December 10, 2021

Tuesday, December 7, 2021

 s from SCMP CEO Gary Liu, His Excellency Mr. Liu Guangyuan, Commissioner of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the People's Republic of China in the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, will outline China's key reforms and foreign policies and how they impact business opportunities in Hong Kong.

9:30 AM

Starts 2 min before the session time

As we near the one-year mark of the Biden presidency, the administration’s policies toward China have differed only slightly from that of the previous administration. Many observers have even expressed a level of surprise at the confrontational approach that has largely guided its actions to date — including increased sanctions toward Beijing and some of its officials. Of concern to many business leaders, however, has been the lack of a clear agenda on trade, investment and tariff policies toward China, harming the prospects of US companies who seek to do business with the world’s second-largest economy. With almost a year to review, has a baseline been established for what is to be expected in the coming three years? In what ways has Biden’s overall foreign policy approach differ from the previous administration? When can business leaders expect a clearer picture on the administration’s trade and investment policies toward China?

  • Anna Ashton, Vice President, Government Affairs, US-China Business Council
  • Daniel Russel, Vice President, International Security and Diplomacy, Asia Society Policy Institute
  • Dr. Huiyao Wang, Founder & President, Center for China and Globalization
  • ModeratorRobert Delaney, North America Bureau Chief, South China Morning Post
10:45 AM

Starts 2 min before the session time

Chinese regulators have been involved in near-continuous campaigns targeting the country’s tech giants since last winter when government bodies were tasked with curbing a “disorderly expansion of capital”. Labelled as a short-term cost that must be paid to ensure the healthy long-term growth of the digital economy, the ensuing crackdown has wiped more than US$1 trillion off Chinese tech stocks, leaving rattled investors trying to guess what regulators might do next. What are the long-term repercussions both domestically in China and to the international community? How should investors be shifting their strategies around the Chinese tech sector? How much more could come down the pipeline, and which industries could be in the crosshairs? How are Chinese tech companies changing their strategies to adhere to this new reality?

  • Kevin T. Carter, Founder, EMQQ; CEO, Big Tree Capital
  • Joyce Chang, Chair of Global Research, J.P. Morgan
  • Wendy Chen, Founder & CIO, Sigmoid Capital
  • ModeratorRobert Delaney, North America Bureau Chief, South China Morning Post
11:45 AM

Starts 2 min before the session time

Dr. Da Wei, Deputy Director of the Center for International Strategy and Security at Tsinghua University, joins the conference to discuss how Chinese experts are currently assessing the current state of the US-China relationship. The discussion will analyse why the relationship between the US and China remains about as tense and contentious as it was during the final months of the Trump Administration. While the US and China have engaged each other at high levels, fundamental and seemingly irreconcilable differences around a host of issues — including trade, technology, Taiwan, Hong Kong and the South China Sea, among others — remain evident.

12:15 PM

Starts 2 min before the session time

US Vice President Kamala Harris’ recent trip to Singapore and Vietnam was seen by many as a firm signal to the ASEAN region that the US has an enduring commitment to the region — a welcome sign of renewed focus by the Biden administration in the South China Sea. Recognizing that the Indo-Pacific has become a vital strategic and economic region, the US will seek to preserve diplomatic stability while countering China’s influence in the region. US officials have stressed, however, that there is no intent on forcing regional countries to pick a side, accounting for regional countries’ disinterest in a ‘zero sum’ mentality between Beijing and Washington. As the US seeks to increase influence in the region, what strategies are likely to be implemented and how will this impact regional diplomacy? What are the economic benefits being sought? Does an increased presence in Southeast Asia increase the likelihood of conflict between Washington and Beijing?

  • Michael D. Swaine, Director, East Asia Program, Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft
  • Susan A. Thornton, Senior Fellow, Paul Tsai China Center, Yale Law School
  • Amb. Kurt TongFormer US Consul General to Hong Kong and Macau; Partner, The Asia Group
  • ModeratorMark Magnier, US Correspondent, South China Morning Post
2:00 PM

Starts 2 min before the session time

Trade conflict, bilateral tensions, the threat of technology decoupling and disruptions from the Covid-19 pandemic have coalesced to drive US and Chinese companies to diversify their supply chains to Southeast Asia. While many businesses are still tethered to China for their production to varying degrees, a new “China +1” strategy has emerged. In fact, ASEAN has become China’s top trade partner, surpassing the US and the European Union. China’s addition to RCEP and its application to join the CPTPP has only further solidified the growing importance of the ASEAN region. Meanwhile, US policymakers know that developing a level of supply chain capacity outside of China, while providing aid and expertise to ASEAN nations and businesses, ensures soft power and political relationships are maintained with partners in the region. Which ASEAN nations have the most fertile ground for growth and investment? How does a reluctance to join the CPTPP impact US trade relationships in the region? What are the key challenges that come with shifting supply chains from China to ASEAN countries? What does all of this mean for China’s “One Belt One Road” initiative?

  • Sourabh Gupta, Head, Trade & Tech Program, Institute for China-America Studies
  • Dr. Mary E. Lovely, Senior Fellow, Peterson Institute for International Economics
  • ModeratorOwen Churchill, US Correspondent, South China Morning Post
3:15 PM

Starts 2 min before the session time

While conflicting views and competing interests are largely at the forefront of the US-China relationship, there is at least one vector that seems an obvious avenue for bilateral collaboration — the fight against climate change. And while the two countries released a joint statement agreeing to cooperate in curbing climate change with urgency earlier this year, meaningful cooperation has been almost non-existent since. With climate change being a key priority in the Biden administration strategy to rebuild US soft power and global leadership credentials, some experts worry that rather than facilitating bilateral cooperation, climate change could be utilised as yet another effort in countering China’s global influence. To what degree is a collaborative effort between the two countries genuine? What are the key opportunities where collaboration can be meaningful? What do these efforts mean to the global economic landscape? Could we see climate change-related policies become politicised in a way that actually hinders the overall effort for meaningful change?

  • Dr. Joanna Lewis, Provost's Distinguished Associate Professor & Director - Science, Technology and International Affairs Program, Georgetown University
  • Dr. Scott Moore, Director of China Programs & Strategic Initiatives, University of Pennsylvania
  • Taiya Smith, Senior Associate, E3G
  • ModeratorRobert Delaney, North America Bureau Chief, South China Morning Post
Day 2
9:00 AM

Starts 2 min before the session time

Keynote by Nicolas Aguzin, CEO, HKEX

9:30 AM

Starts 2 min before the session time

As mainland China reasserts control over its powerful private enterprises, US investors in Chinese stocks have had to reckon with an often glossed-over risk: the fact that they do not technically own the companies. Beijing’s recent crackdown on its US$100 billion tutoring industry included a ban on companies using variable interest entities (VIEs) — holding companies designed to elude strict rules that forbid foreign investors from ownership in China’s key sectors. While it was the first time China has prohibited a sector from using VIEs, the move has forced investors to face the prospect that a ban could be introduced in other sectors. Can US investors trust their holdings in Chinese stocks ever again? How would further VIE restrictions impact Wall Street? Despite uncertainties, what are the benefits to investing through a VIE structure? Are there any positives that could come from further scrutiny on VIE structures?

  • Marcia Ellis, Partner & Global Chair, Private Equity Group, Morrison & Foerster
  • Liqian Ren, Director of Modern Alpha, WisdomTree Asset Management
  • William Rosenstadt, Partner & Co-founder, Ortoli Rosenstadt
  • Anne Stevenson-Yang, Managing Principal, J Capital Research
  • ModeratorEugene Tang, Business Editor, South China Morning Post
10:45 AM

Starts 2 min before the session time

How can women in China and the United States increase dialogue and expand exchanges within organizations, universities and companies to increase cooperation and opportunities?  Through the promotion of knowledge sharing and networking in different sectors like technology, finance, retail and non-profit organizations, women can be a vital factor for solving the world's most pressing problems including climate change and violence against women and Asian Americans.  Hear from female entrepreneurs and thought leaders about taking steps that increase collaboration between women in the two countries.

  • Mei Xu, Chief Exectuive Officer, Yes She May
  • Susan Yuqing Feng, Editor-in-Chief, Bitpush News
  • ModeratorLeslie Wolf-Creutzfeldt, Executive Director, China-US Women's Foundation
11:30 AM

Starts 2 min before the session time

  • John Artman, Manager, Data, South China Morning Post
  • Moderator: Joey Liu, Chief of Staff, South China Morning Post
12:15 PM